CDs are not dead yet - or even on life support - but they are definitely in
intensive care. Over the last fifteen years its dominance as a musical format
has declined to almost the point of no return, so it’s time for a tribute to
those shiny, little discs.
I was one person who immediately fell in love with the CD when it arrived on
the scene in 1982. I thought I had died and gone to stereo heaven because I
always obsessed over the annoying scratches, clicks, and pops that most
records accumulated over time even though I took extremely good care of them.
I used Discwasher regularly, and I still use it today on any records I play.
As soon as I put my first CD in the player's little sliding drawer I
appreciated its extra playing time - most double LPs could fit on a single
disc - and the expanded sonic field. The increased clarity was apparent to me
immediately on most percussion and acoustic instruments. Female vocals sounded
far superior then they ever did before.
For the first time I started a classical music collection, in part because the
quiet passages many of the pieces contained could be heard without those
extraneous noises, turntable hum, or damage done by the tone arm's stylus even
when using top notch equipment.
Another impressive thing about the then new technology was the massive reissue
campaign it spawned. Tons of out-of-print LPs were re-released as the record
companies' archives opened wide. The extensive liner notes that accompanied
many of them and the multitude of box sets that became quite popular at the
same time were very welcome and informative.
You could easily play CDs in your car. All you needed to do was simply slide
them into the slot on your dashboard. There was no need to worry about
cassette tapes getting tangled in your player. As a bonus you could leave them
in a hot car because they wouldn't warp and melt like vinyl did.
Another reason to buy CDs is the cost. I'm not trying to appear cheap, but I can't justify paying double and sometimes even triple the price for new vinyl for its "warmth" - whatever that is - when I can buy the exact same thing on CD at a far more reasonable price.
I became a fan of multi-disc players, and in 1994 my wife bought me a Philips
five-disc carousel player for Christmas to replace my original Onkyo single
disc player that has now been replaced by an Integra six-disc carousel. I
still use my player on a regular basis, especially in December when during our
annual Christmas Eve party I carefully program an eclectic mix of holiday
music that plays the entire evening instead of having to jump up every fifteen
minutes to change the record.
Admittedly, early CDs weren't perfect, but it wasn't the fault of the
technology. The record companies saw to that. The frequent hidden songs were
always annoying, especially when they weren't given their own separate tracks.
Too often the last song would end but the track wouldn't. Then, after perhaps
as much as three minutes of stone-cold silence the extra tune - whose title
was rarely provided - would suddenly and, without warning, start playing.
Just as stupid were the blank tracks separating the last song from the rest of
the disc. One example is the debut release from The Dave Matthews Band,
Under the Table and Dreaming. After the eleventh song ended there were
twenty-two blank tracks - each just a few seconds long - before the whole CD
closed with the last tune, an instrumental named after its track number,
"#34."
Another negative side effect of the CD was that artists often fell too much in
love with its additional playing time. They frequently stopped editing
themselves. There usually was a reason that the songs they left off of their
old LPs didn't make the cut. Instead of choosing the best ten or twelve
performances from the sessions for their new album your favorite band could
now release fifteen or sixteen songs or more. Too often these extras diluted
the album, deceiving the consumer into thinking there was less good stuff on
it than there really was. Listeners often believed they were laying out too much cash for mediocre
music, but the longer discs were almost always sold at the same price as the
shorter ones. However, I think the majority of listeners thought otherwise and
this could explain the popularity of buying individual songs today. Music
lovers no longer have to pay full price to get the three or four songs they
enjoy.
The trend of adding unnecessary garbage and hidden tracks to CDs seems to have
ended. Unless you're buying a compilation, box set, or special edition most
regular CD releases today have only the same ten to twelve tracks the LP
version offers.
Like many music lovers I wholeheartedly embraced iTunes, and I currently have
over 21,000 songs on my 160 G ipod classic that holds 40,000 tracks. It's
another beloved relic that proves I'm not young anymore. Most of the music
from my CD collection has been transferred to iTunes and a growing percentage
of my purchases are mp3s. I love my ipod, and the convenience it provides, but
I don’t feel like I own the album if I can't hold a physical copy in my hands,
and that is why I always burn my new purchases to CD.
CD yes, mp3 no. I find it odd that you find LPs inferior but you're OK with mp3. That produces some cognitive dissonance for me. Really like your blog though.
ReplyDeleteI like mp3s/ipod mostly for the convenience. It's great when I'm at the gym or on the go. I often play the ipod in my car so I can hear my music. It's cool to have all of my music on one little device. I still like CDs better. My ipod sounds pretty good when I play it through my stereo system on occasion when I want to shuffle more songs than my CD player allows.
ReplyDeleteI held off on CDs for a while, as I'd already dumped a lot of money into LPs and cassettes. After I "won" a free CD of Lou Reed's New York in early '89 I figured it was a matter of time, and I eventually bought a used player from a friend.
ReplyDeleteEven then I was very particular about what I bought. My sister was very kind and got me the White Album for Xmas that year because she knew I didn't want to part with $30 for something I already had.
Soon enough the majors stopped producing vinyl, and by that time I had already worked in what I still call record stores, and a distributor for a time, so I kept my eyes open for promos and sales. I managed a CD store for most of the '90s, so I got first dibs on any used CDs that came through.
I'd also amassed quite the pile of Maxell tapes with albums dubbed onto them, as I had a car with a tape deck as late as 2013. By that time they started making vinyl again, but even more pricey than CDs. Why would I spend $30 on something that had the risk of sounding worse for wear over time, especially when I could get the same album used for what it would have cost me in the '70s or '80s? (That, of course, changed, as stores started jacking up prices to meet demand.)
Once I got a Mac laptop in 2005 I loaded up my iTunes with things I already owned, ripped other people's CDs, and "acquired" MP3s of other things. An iPod shuffle on random became my car audio.
These days my purchases tend to be new CDs by artists I already like and collect, most of whom had started their careers in the last century, and box sets/upgrades of same. I still troll used vinyl stores, haven't played cassettes in years, and do most of my listening of new music via Spotify. (The blog doesn't write itself, after all.)
But yeah, I like looking at my shelves and seeing albums with all their siblings nicely lined up.